Challenging
Schweikert’s EPA Lies
(Corporate
Water Use Threatens Sea Life)*
A Guest Column by W John Williamson,
candidate AZ-06 (Dem)
*-- This article arrived untitled.
On May 30, Rep. David Schweikert
appeared on FOX
NEWS, talking about the EPA's
proposed water rule to be added to the Clean
Water Act. He made it sound like
this is some kind of frivolous exercise
by the federal government to
harass private property owners. He did not
mention at all what the rule
really relates to.
Here's what the proposed rule is
really about, as reported by the U.S.
Water Alliance: "The EPA has
finalized standards to protect billions of
fish and other aquatic life drawn
each year into cooling water systems at
large power plants and factories.
An estimated 2.1 billion fish, crabs,
and shrimp are killed annually by
these cooling water systems. The new
rule requires plants with cooling
water intakes to look at the impact on
aquatic life in local waterways
and take steps to minimize that impact."
Further, the website explains:
"This rule establishes requirements under
the Clean Water Act for all
existing power-generating, manufacturing, and
industrial facilities that withdraw
more than 2 million gallons per day of
water from waters of the U.S. and
use at least 25 percent of the water
they withdraw exclusively for
cooling purposes. It covers roughly 1,065
existing facilities. The rule
requires the facilities to take one of seven
approaches for using the best
technology available to reduce fish
impingement." ("EPA's
New Rule for Cooling Water Intakes," U.S. Water
Alliance, June 11, 2014,
www.uswateralliance.org.)
So this rule is designed to
protect 2.1 billion fish, crabs and shrimp. No
doubt this is not just an
environmental issue but a commercial issue as
well. There are probably
businesses that are sustained by catching some of
those fish, crabs and shrimp.
People's livelihoods no doubt depend upon
the well-being of these aquatic
life forms.
Moreover, the Federal Register
states: "The purposes of the proposed rule
are to ensure protection of our
nation's aquatic resources and make the
process of identifying 'Waters of
the U.S.' less complicated and more
efficient. The rule achieves
these goals by increasing CWA program
transparency, predictability, and
consistency." (Federal Register, Vol.
79, No. 76, p. 22,190, April 21,
2014.)
I bet there are a lot of people
who like to fish recreationally who would
like to see those aquatic
resources protected as well.
Once again, it would seem that
Rep. Schweikert is obfuscating the true
nature of an issue with his
misleading statements. He makes it sound like
the EPA's proposed new water rule
has to do with a petty concern about a
desert wash going through his
backyard when it really has to do with
protecting 2.1 billion individual
entities of aquatic life that support
not only commercial but
recreational interests in our great land.
When elected as your member of
Congress, I will not take lightly
environmental issues that impact
the well-being of commercial and
recreational fishing. Arizona has
a lot of recreational fishing, and I
would want to protect that.
If you would like to contribute
to my campaign, please visit my website at
www.williamsonforuscongress.com.
Click on "Make a Donation," and dare to
stand by your Democratic
candidate who cares about the quality of our
water for the sake of not only
business but also recreational interests.
The Future Can Be Ours by
protecting, as the Federal Register states, "our
nation's aquatic resources."
Water, and the life forms it sustains, are
critical to our well-being not
only as Arizonans but as Americans.
WILLIAMSON FOR U.S.
CONGRESS
DEMOCRAT CONGRESSIONAL
DISTRICT 6
"The Future Can Be
Ours."
No comments:
Post a Comment